by goldragon_70 » May 30th, 2006, 6:48 pm
[quote="Shaderone"][quote="goldragon_7/\[url=(https?:\/\/[^\s\[]+):$uid\](.*?)\[\/url:$uid\]/i"]no they have been considered a furry for a while. Maybe because there is alot of people that like dragons. This is why I'm not sure if merpeople are furries.[/quote]
Merpeople are, in fact, furries. The correct definition of furry is "humanoid-formed creatures with animal faces, fur/scale/feathers/whatever, and often appropriate tails, wings, claws, etc., able to speak, and with a human-like personality, though quite often with "quirks" hinting at the real-life animal upon which the character is based". Understanding the fact that the word 'furry' does not mean it must have fur, amphibians, mythical creatures, and other scaled creatures may be furries. Of course, the original 'Homo Sapien' has been regarded as perhaps the first furry to walk the earth.
Also, I'm not sure where this source is from, it may not be reliable, but apparently there's a difference between 'anthro' and 'furry'. Furries are more human, while anthros are more animal. Can anyone confirm that?[/quote]
Think you for the post, but that was pointed out to me at lest a few months ago.
In my dreams I once said, "Ahh, Yes, but how many minds does my one mind hold?".