by slyfox » July 22nd, 2013, 4:05 pm
[quote="rugbyjockca":a919/\[url=(https?:\/\/[^\s\[]+):$uid\](.*?)\[\/url:$uid\]/ib9c]Rubbapig brings up a good point about being dominant vs submissive....because on the rugby teams I';ve played on, there've definitely been the dominant alpha types, but there are also the follower types too, and usually there are a lot more followers than alphas.
Do you have to be alpha to be a jock? 'Cause I see myself as bein more of a happy go-lucky, does-what-he's-told kind of muscle jock. :)[/quote:a919/\[url=(https?:\/\/[^\s\[]+):$uid\](.*?)\[\/url:$uid\]/ib9c]
I used to be a really submissive person. I wanted to be taken advantage of. Hell, there was a period where I even considered feminization (that would have been a very bad idea lol). But since I started becoming a jock, I really like being in control, whether as a top or a bottom (which in particular I find being a dominant, aggressive bottom to be amazingly hot :D ).
I don't think it's a requirement for jocks to be either way though. Jocks come in all colors!