Moderator: EMG
lostrose wrote:Hmmm, let's see...A bunch of people who have an unusual, even "weird" and yet mostly harmless pastime vs someone who wastes his/her time browsing over a website devoted to a topic he/she thinks is for "bizarre ass mother fuckers". Which one is more sad?
joe wrote:i'm just waiting for sandy82's usual yet acerbic reply to THIS one. :wink:
danmalara wrote:Sandy, you are insane!!!!!! I'm gonna play doctor for sec and tell u that you spend TOO much time on this site: "you spend TOO much time on this site." << There now that the doctor has said it, it is official. (Sandy, this post is only here to protect you from the harmful health risks of spending too much time and doing too much research for a single post.)
:D Have a nice day! :D
O-kay, now I'm hooked. Can I see it? Please please please? (does hyperactive dance)sandy82 wrote:If you didn't like the version you commented on, jbr, you would have hated the original.
johnbohnrevenge wrote:O-kay, now I'm hooked. Can I see it? Please please please? (does hyperactive dance)sandy82 wrote:If you didn't like the version you commented on, jbr, you would have hated the original.
lostrose wrote:Hmmm, let's see...A bunch of people blah blah blah yet mostly harmless pastime vs blah blah blah blah
Phoenix-D wrote:Eh, not too bad but you gave things away too early with your name.
I give this a 3 out of 10 on the Troll O Meter.
sandy82 wrote: Something about the author strikes me as unusual. He allegedly joined for the first time on May 19. On May 24 he supposedly made his first post and, at the same time, opened a new thread. How many first-timers know how to do that?
sandy82 wrote: The author reminds me of a former user whose opposition to hypnosis seemed nearly psychotic. The former user made two or three posts on the site in late April. The most egregious one went up on Wednesday, April 27, at about 1830 GMT. It came down rather quickly, and there were no further posts from that particular username.
The two of them seem to have a great deal in common.
makidas wrote: fun with it
No-T wrote:Hmm, still no replies? But I thought everyone was having so muchmakidas wrote: fun with it
I guess not :(
No-T wrote:
And no, I am not SK_5555 or hypnotism_sucks.
sandy82 wrote:
When I get to 247 posts, remind me again that I spend too much time on this site. :)
Aw... sounds almost as if this forum is the only form of enjoyment you have left to you. Glad to see you enjoy this stuff.MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:Hmm, still no replies? But I thought everyone was having so muchmakidas wrote: fun with it
I guess not :(
johnbohnrevenge wrote:I'm not edging away because of what that_guy_812 said. On the contrary, I trust that guy. I really do. (Someone - help!)that_guy_812 wrote:I'd be a sad person without this warpmymind forum....no wait, I mean I'd b an INSANE per... no, thats not right either........ ummm, I wouldn't be a serial kil......
sandy82 wrote: You obviously are bright
sandy82 wrote: Why 89/100 of first-time users? It could easily be 91/100...or 28/100. Who knows. As H.L. Mencken once said, "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste [or the talent] of the American public." I'm sure you can identify with Mencken. You cultivate an attitude of superiority to those around you. Make sure to nurture it. I'm not sure how hearty it is.
sandy82 wrote: You also have a good sense of humor, even though you may not realize it.
sandy82 wrote: Here's a great one-liner.
No-T wrote:
And no, I am not SK_5555 or hypnotism_sucks.
Your assurance reminds me of the story about the notorious perjuror. He was brought into court from the penitentiary to testify in another matter. The clerk asked him if he swore to tell the truth, the whole truth.... The whole courtroom burst into laughter.
You can see the unfortunate, albeit imperfect, applicability to your situation. Your track record at this site is short and undistinguished. We have no basis on which to have established a groundwork of trust.
sandy82 wrote: Incidentally, your full username causes some delay in typing. I hope you don't mind my calling you "No-T." That's from the missing "T" on the end of HyPnOtIsT. I can assure that there's nothing subliminal hidden there. No Freudian associations are intended either, although the letter "T" is an interesting shape.
sandy82 wrote:I have a question for you, No-T. If you know that "SK.. 5555" and "hypnotism_sucks" are the same person, you must be familiar with him/her. How is it then that you know part but not all of the former username?
sandy82 wrote:Second part of the same question. You claim to be adept at the workings of this site. How is it that in the course of over fours on May 25 (3:18 pm EDT to 7:30 pm EDT), you didn't use the index to the Members List to get the exact, full sequence of the "555" username.
sandy82 wrote:No-T, is it that you're not so skilled with computers as you think you are?
sandy82 wrote:Is your heart rent for the young oral sex queen? Maybe you feel that she has been victimized by hypnotism. Along with her supposed mother, who probably hadn't seen such excitement since they started putting malt liquor in cans. The whole episode reads like pulp porn--and about equally convincing.
sandy82 wrote:I was left wondering two things.
sandy82 wrote:Your story has some rather gaping holes in it.
sandy82 wrote:Frankely, I'm disappointed in you
sandy82 wrote:You may wonder what my excuse is. I'm a member of the American public, and it's very hard to underestimate my taste. I'll read anything, No-T.
Including your posts.
sandy82 wrote:By the way, seen any Martians lately? :wink:
No, as I stated before, I have a life, I don't live on the internet. I'm not really even enjoying this. What I said was merely a sarsactic form of sympathy for those not enjoying my posts.johnbohnrevenge wrote:Aw... sounds almost as if this forum is the only form of enjoyment you have left to you. Glad to see you enjoy this stuff.
Agriff wrote:You get the award for longest post, most def. You did a good job defending yourself.
missypuss wrote:Fascinating!! Incredibly Sad ....Yet Strangely Fascinating. Perhaps a :twisted: few counselling sessions would help things ??
As H.L. Mencken once said, "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste [or the talent] of the American public." I'm sure you can identify with Mencken.
Your assurance reminds me of the story about the notorious perjuror. He was brought into court from the penitentiary to testify in another matter. The clerk asked him if he swore to tell the truth, the whole truth.... The whole courtroom burst into laughter.
You can see the unfortunate, albeit imperfect, applicability to your situation. Your track record at this site is short and undistinguished. We have no basis on which to have established a groundwork of trust.
Incidentally, your full username causes some delay in typing. I hope you don't mind my calling you "No-T." That's from the missing "T" on the end of HyPnOtIsT. I can assure that there's nothing subliminal hidden there. No Freudian associations are intended either, although the letter "T" is an interesting shape.
Is your heart rent for the young oral sex queen? Maybe you feel that she has been victimized by hypnotism. Along with her supposed mother, who probably hadn't seen such excitement since they started putting malt liquor in cans. The whole episode reads like pulp porn--and about equally convincing.
Second part of the same question. You claim to be adept at the workings of this site. How is it that in the course of over fours on May 25 (3:18 pm EDT to 7:30 pm EDT), you didn't use the index to the Members List to get the exact, full sequence of the "555" username.
You may wonder what my excuse is. I'm a member of the American public, and it's very hard to underestimate my taste. I'll read anything, No-T.
By the way, seen any Martians lately?
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:
but even if you're not, I can garuntee most people would agree that many of the things on this site are wrong, immoral, and in many cases disgusting. *snickers*.
xanthk wrote: How do you define most people? Do you know most people? Can you think of any person anywhere who doesn't in some way deviate from what society at large considers normal? If so, this is a person I 'd like to meet.
xanthk wrote:Desiring to change oneself to gain happiness is not immoral. Listening to these files is wrong, only in that it foes against the common thought. And throughout history it has been estabished that the majority is always right. Right?
xanthk wrote:Disgusting? Possibly, but all those of us who are here, are here of our own volition, yourself included. Nobody here is forcing any specific files on us, we listen to what interests us, the rest we are free to ignore.
xanthk wrote:I am a perfectly normal person, but I have fantasies that at least to some extent I can use these files to, for a time, fulfill.
xanthk wrote:By the way, I am to some extent a religious person, although I'm sure my religion differs from that which you seem to assume should belong to us all. Oddly enough my religion has no problems with what I've seen here.
Agriff wrote:Did anyone else realize that he edited his post? Or have you all just been using the "2" link below the topic title?
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:By most people I mean the general public. Though everyone sins that still doesn't make it right.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:The fact that you enjoy something in no way justifies your actions. Let's say i want to kill someone, to gain happiness of course, does that make it moral? Not all cases of persueing happiness are immoral, but many on this site are.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:And that justifies your point how? It's basicaly saying the files on this site aren't immoral, just the people.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:Good for you, but if you do this in an inappropriate way I must disagree with it.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:I in no way pushed my religion on you, I'm not a missionary. And some of what I've seen here not only goes against my religion, but the commom opinion of what is right and wrong.
Jack wrote:
What gives you the right, not to mention the "general public", to judge what is right for any other individual?
Jack wrote:No tool is moral or immoral. Morality is based upon the specific application of a specific tool at a specific time. I suggest that if you want to kill someone, to gain happiness, that you find someone who wants to be killed, to gain happiness.
Jack wrote:MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:Good for you, but if you do this in an inappropriate way I must disagree with it.
I must say that I agree with you on that point. However, again, we come to the point of: who are you to judge for other people?
Jack wrote:I suggest you do one of two things:
1. Go elsewhere.
2. Change your mind.
Beyond that, I believe it was Aleister Crowley who said "Do what thou will shall be the whole of the law."
of mine.lostrose wrote: unusual, even "weird" and yet mostly harmless pastime
Jack wrote:
1. Go elsewhere.
2. Change your mind.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:I am your peer, along with the rest of the "general public". We are functioning in a society. Someone has to decide what is right and wrong or else we'd be living in anarchy. When you are convicted of a felony, who decides whether or not you are guilty? Your peers. Ok Jack, let's say a loved one of yours is killed. You want the killer prosecuted, but then again, who are you to judge the killers actions.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:I would have to disagree with you here. In my opinion, there is no justifiable murder, but that's just my opinion.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:I have a tendency to stand by my opinions, so I think #2 is out of the question, and I actualy do enjoy arguing, its almost aof mine.lostrose wrote: unusual, even "weird" and yet mostly harmless pastime
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:And I bid you good day.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:The fact that you enjoy something in no way justifies your actions.
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote: Let's say i want to kill someone, to gain happiness of course, does that make it moral?
MaStErHyPnOtIs wrote:Not all cases of persueing happiness are immoral, but many on this site are.
Good for you, I'm glad you're not a push-over. Too many people in this world give up way too easily. I also have an unusual, even "weird" and yet mostly harmless pastime, it's called thinking.
I mostly agree with this opinion. Before I would let anyone be killed that wants to be killed, I'd want to make sure that it would really benefit that individual and those around them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests