Moderator: EMG
coco123 wrote:.... tommy had passed away and nobody is running the business no more so its nobody's file anymore right
rustyrivers wrote:I am working on a follow up on the video I made with flashing photo's.
I do not know much about copy rights so I post the question here, seeing the topic is on.
The picturs flash for about 0.1 second. Does that fall under copy right aswel. There are all kind of pics used. Thousands actually.
I have finished is but before I upload it I want to check if I am not causing any problems
Hope someone can clarify this for me.
Best regards
Rusty
davelowe1977 wrote:I have emailed the person (stevene73) via ebay. Basically, I outlined the legal position that you highlighted and asked for proof of ownership.
davelowe1977 wrote:davelowe1977 wrote:I have emailed the person (stevene73) via ebay. Basically, I outlined the legal position that you highlighted and asked for proof of ownership.
Okay, so communication happened. I asked the guy if he had permission, he said yes. Then I replied 'pretending' to legally represent some US entity (a bit naughty, but never mind) and threatened to report him to ebay if he didn't produce any documentation. The tone of his next message changed - he said basically that lots of people were selling the stuff and he didn't much care about copyright - the implication being that he didn't own the material. In fact, his last missive was that he had reported me to ebay for threatening him(!).
From reading around on the internet (always a dangerous thing), it appears that DPF was some kind of corporate entity and owned the files. It was advertised for sale, but at an unrealistic price since membership had dwindled to near enough 0 and most people who were active on it had moved elsewhere. To all intents and purposes, it folded. The files are therefore probably in the public domain.
seattleworld wrote:Well if you want the true owernership go to the US Patent site that will show you all patenented matrial in process [....] The DPF.com site was a mutiple site entity and had Diaper stories as well as hypnosis reccordings....
davelowe1977 wrote:
From reading around on the internet (always a dangerous thing), it appears that DPF was some kind of corporate entity and owned the files. It was advertised for sale, but at an unrealistic price since membership had dwindled to near enough 0 and most people who were active on it had moved elsewhere. To all intents and purposes, it folded. The files are therefore probably in the public domain.
seattleworld wrote:Well if you want the true owernership go to the US Patent site that will show you all patenented matrial in process. like MIcrosoft pattons and the like. so there if you go to the US paton office it will tell who owns them in the United States. from what I understand is in every country they have pattons. the Files were originally a US domain which was DPF. com. The DPF.com site was a mutiple site entity and had Diaper stories as well as hypnosis reccordings. I haven't seen any DPF stories posted.
Return to Diapers and Incontinence
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests